Charis SIL, used in the Longman Pronunciation Dictionary

Fonts for phonetic transcriptions: An overview

In 2014, I started compiling a list of fonts for typesetting phonetic transcriptions using symbols of the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA). It is probably the most comprehensive and up-to-date list of such fonts, providing short, yet detailed reviews of the typefaces and the quality of their symbols – but it has two disadvantages: First, the reviews are written in German, which most people do not read. Second, the list – featuring more than 40 typefaces – has grown quite long and maybe even a bit confusing. If you are looking for a decent sans-serif typeface that includes phonetic symbols in its bold style, the long list will not be much help. That is why created a table of all fonts for phonetic transcriptions I am aware of (thanks to Friedrich Althausen, the designer of the Vollkorn typeface, for the suggestion!).
Charis SIL, used in the Longman Pronunciation Dictionary by John C. Wells
For each font family, I have indicated whether the roman and italic styles in the regular and bold weights contain phonetic symbols (R: Regular Roman; I: Regular Italic; B: Bold Roman; BI: Bold Italic).¹ Whenever a typeface family includes more than these four styles, this is noted in the ‘More styles’ column (but you’ll have to look up the details for yourself). This is also true when a typeface has more than one bold weight (e.g., Semibold and Bold) or more than one italic style (e.g., ‘true’ italics and oblique). If you want to read the reviews of the typefaces, click on their names (warning: 🇩🇪 content ahead).

In each category,  means that a (more or less) complete set of phonetic symbols is available. Even if a font is marked that way, some symbols may be missing. (✓) means that a style or weight is present in the typeface, but that it does not contain phonetic symbols.  means that a style or weight is missing entirely from the typeface in question.² The last column contains a rating: This is not about whether a typeface is nice in general, but only refers to the design and functioning of the phonetic symbols. Still, it is certainly somewhat subjective, so feel free to comment if your evaluation differs substantially from mine. Also, please let me know if you know of any other typefaces with phonetic symbols.

AndikaSans Serif(✓)(✓)(✓)★★★★☆
ArialSans Serif★★★★☆
ArimoSans Serif★★★☆☆
CalibriSans Serif★★★★★
ConsolasMono Serif★★★★☆
Courier NewMono Serif★★★☆☆
DejaVu SansSans Serif(✓)★★★★☆
DejaVu Sans MonoMono Sans Serif★★★☆☆
DejaVu SerifSerif★★★☆☆
Everson MonoMono Sans Serif★★★☆☆
Fedra SerifSerif(✓)(✓)(✓)(✓)★★★☆☆
Fira SansSans Serif★★★★★
Italian TypewriterMono Serif(✓)(✓)★★★★☆
Kozuka GothicSans Serif(✓)(✓)★★★☆☆
Kozuka MinchoSerif(✓)(✓)★★★☆☆
Linux BiolinumSans Serif★★☆☆☆
Linux LibertineSerif(✓)★★★☆☆
Lucida SansSans Serif(✓)(✓)(✓)★★★★☆
Microsoft Sans SerifSans Serif★★★★☆
PragmataMono Sans Serif(✓)(✓)(✓)★★☆☆☆
Segoe UISans Serif★★★★★
Stone SansSans Serif(✓)(✓)(✓)(✓)★★★★☆
Stone SerifSerif(✓)(✓)(✓)(✓)★★★★☆
TahomaSans Serif★★★★☆
Times New RomanSerif★★★★☆
UndergroundSans Serif★★★☆☆
VocesSans Serif★★★☆☆
Yu GothicSans Serif★★★☆☆


1   Just to be clear: ‘Regular’ refers to a weight with medium stroke width that is intended to be used as a base weight for setting continuous body text; it may be called ‘Book’, ‘Medium’ or something else in some cases. ‘Bold’ refers to a weight with a heavier stroke width that is intended for emphasising short stretches of text; it may be called ‘Semibold’ or something else in some cases. The ‘Italic’ column conflates type styles that bear traces of cursive handwriting (‘true’ italics) and styles that are mechanically slanted versions of upright styles (with or without manual corrections). 
2   Here is an example: Andika – the second typeface in the table – has phonetic symbols in the Regular Roman (hence in the third column). There are Regular Italic, Bold and Bold Italic styles, but they do not include phonetic symbols (hence (✓) in the fourth to sixth columns). Other than these four basic styles, Andika currently features no other styles or weights (hence in the seventh column). 

Ein Gedanke zu „Fonts for phonetic transcriptions: An overview

  1. Diana Ovezea

    This is very helpful, thank you. Since I am planning to include phonetic symbols in my typeface with multiple styles and weights, this gives a good overview. I was already suspecting that there are not many type families with multiple styles for the phonetic symbols.


Schreibe einen Kommentar

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Erforderliche Felder sind mit * markiert.